data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cc00/1cc00ebda21e4144f3b2a5d176a0e6424a0877b3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68be7/68be79be4daf29c41801d1182f965b19e72e1321" alt=""
I wanted to try out the compressed version because I believed the full size bridge would be too big. Also, six 80' deck bridge sections comes out to an even 36" in N-scale, which means I could use one 3-foot length of aluminum U-channel to be the supporting backbone of the bridge. However, when looking at the two photos the river just seems too narrow in the compressed version. I am also considering using a compressed bridge with the full-size river; in this case, the road would be eliminated. This option is probably not going to be selected because that road is one of my first ever railfanning locations and is a significant reason why I chose to model this area in the first place.
Whatever option I choose, the mockups are a quick way to visualize a completed scene without too much effort (time or money).
.